When: 2011-05-13

Collection location: Central Goldfields, Victoria, Australia [Click for map]

Who: TimmiT

No specimen available



Proposed Names

-28% (1)
Recognized by sight
Based on microscopic features
28% (1)
Used references: Grgur. (1997)
Based on microscopic features

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
Book finally arrived
By: TimmiT
2011-07-05 15:24:24 EDT (-0400)

It covers the four species mentioned and it appears that Hohenbuehelia carbonaria is easily separated by having metuloid cheilocystidia (which I think this observation has). There are descriptions for the other three but not for H. carbonaria, so I’m not sure how it compares in any other respect.

I think so too
By: TimmiT
2011-05-14 12:26:59 EDT (-0400)

particularly the nematophagy. It seems odd to think of a mushroom being predatory.

I have ordered Cheryl Grgurinovic’s book and am waiting patiently for it to arrive – expected delays :( It includes descriptions for each of the species you mentioned. Hopefully it will shed some light on this observation.

Hohenbuehelia is a fascinating genus
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-14 11:33:20 EDT (-0400)

thanks to its habit to feed on nematodes..

It’s probably not culmicola then. But I found four rare species that I beleive are originally described from Australia, but haven’t been able to find pictures or descriptions of any of them (bingarra, clelandii, karrara and carbonaria).

By: TimmiT
2011-05-14 02:32:21 EDT (-0400)

These were found in an area of reclaimed Eucalypt woodland, growing through the middle of a small mound of moss near base of an Ironbark (E. tricarpa). The myc was somewhat rhizomorphic and growing throughout the soil and dead moss within the clump.

By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-13 10:22:05 EDT (-0400)

to see the metuloids too!

What kind of habitat is this? It reminds of Hohenbuehelia culmicola, which grows on Ammophila arenaria (Marram Grass) in sand dunes.

I did
By: TimmiT
2011-05-13 10:13:38 EDT (-0400)

think they were slugs! I had to poke them before I realised that they were mushrooms :P

Top pictures are great!
By: damon brunette (damonbrunette)
2011-05-13 09:01:51 EDT (-0400)

I would have passed over these for slugs. Nice find.

Created: 2011-05-13 07:58:35 EDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2011-07-05 15:23:34 EDT (-0400)
Viewed: 315 times, last viewed: 2020-05-14 08:52:09 EDT (-0400)
Show Log