When: 2011-05-28

Collection location: Tim Sage’s Homebase, Shoreline, King Co., Washington, USA [Click for map]

Who: Tim Sage (NMNR)

No specimen available

Species Lists


Proposed Names

84% (4)
Recognized by sight

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
Thank you for the clarification!
By: Tim Sage (NMNR)
2011-05-30 13:35:37 CDT (-0400)

I agree it can’t be much else. Thanks for you input, very much!

Sorry, my error
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-30 13:24:10 CDT (-0400)

I have a book with swedish earthstars, and there’s a scheme with the number of rays. On a closer look I realize that the rows with species names are displaced in the scheme, and the numbers refer to quadrifidum (of course! What was I thinking..?)
Anyway, I have seen them with less than 5 rays. And I don’t know of any other possibilities, except that there are some different varieties of it described.

Arora says 5-12 rays, usually 6-10….
By: Tim Sage (NMNR)
2011-05-30 12:23:14 CDT (-0400)

So that is why I was wondering. Do you have a source that says 3-5? These two specimens each had 4.

I still think G. pectinatum is likely, I was just curious if anyone knew of any other possibilities.

Agree with pectinatum
By: Irene Andersson (irenea)
2011-05-30 03:33:37 CDT (-0400)

It’s also one of the species with the fewest rays, usually 3-5.

Anyone know of anything similar?
By: Tim Sage (NMNR)
2011-05-29 14:14:35 CDT (-0400)

The two I plucked only had 4 large rays as opposed to 5 or 6 like G. pectinatum. Any ideas of other beaked Earthstars with a pedicel?

cool find!
By: Britney Ramsey (Riverdweller)
2011-05-29 00:17:34 CDT (-0400)

these are neat!

Created: 2011-05-28 23:59:37 CDT (-0400)
Last modified: 2011-05-30 02:05:38 CDT (-0400)
Viewed: 163 times, last viewed: 2019-09-27 01:54:18 CDT (-0400)
Show Log