Observation 71483: Otidea (Pers.) Bonord.
When: 2011-06-26
Collection location: Colebrook, Connecticut, USA [Click for map]
Who: Bill (boletebill)
No specimen available
Notes:
these were less an a half an ich across
Species Lists
Images
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 4.78 | 1 | (boletebill) | |||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.65 | 55.13% |
User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote. | |||||||||
Vote | Score | Weight | Users | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
I’d Call It That | 3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Promising | 2.0 | 5.57 | 1 | (Mycowalt) | |||||
Could Be | 1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Doubtful | -1.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Not Likely | -2.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
As If! | -3.0 | 0.00 | 0 | ||||||
Overall Score sum(score * weight) / (total weight + 1) |
1.70 | 56.52% |
Comments
Add Comment
I’m surprised no one else challanged this
By: Bill (boletebill)
2013-11-19 08:27:21 EST (-0500)
identification before you and I explicitly questioned my own ID. These small cups were on well rotted wood and did not look like any Otidea that I was familiar with. My impression was the some cups were folded slightly rather than split but I have to admit I did not do any microscopy and my ID was based on picture matching and google searching. Whatever this is I believe have found it several times but didn’t photograph it before.
Possibly Otidea sp.?
By: The Dianna Smith
2013-11-19 07:45:35 EST (-0500)
Bill,
Just a thought, these look a lot like very young Otidea sp. I think Tarzetta would not exhibit a ‘split’ in the cup. What is confusing is the wood substrate. I wonder if the wood was ‘rotten’.