|User’s votes are weighted by their contribution to the site (log10 contribution). In addition, the user who created the observation gets an extra vote.|
|I’d Call It That||3.0||0.00||0|
sum(score * weight) /
(total weight + 1)
thanks for the information.
was where Klofac put R. phaeseolisporus. I have not requested any loans (yet). Other projects are on the front burners at the moment.
it coulda been slightly viscid. Klofac ruled out R. phaseolisporus though if I remember well. But it certainly belongs to Tylopilus. The material is in Vienna. Did you loan the Tylopilus from Queensland as you wished some time ago?
but rather looks like a taxon described by Li & Watling from Western Australia that they called Rubinoboletus phaeseolisporus. Was it slightly viscid? It should have bean-shaped spores, some slightly ornamentation on the stipe and according to a prelim molecular analysis (from material in W Australia), sits on a clade with the ballouioids as a Tylopius. I will need to post the WA material I think. Thanks!
Created: 2012-03-05 12:31:19 CST (-0500)
Last modified: 2012-03-05 12:31:20 CST (-0500)
Viewed: 74 times, last viewed: 2018-02-10 17:39:14 CST (-0500)