Proposed Names

Please login to propose your own names and vote on existing names.

= Observer’s choice
= Current consensus


Add Comment
It says
By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-09 11:51:58 PST (-0800)

a key to SOME genera. But you’re right. I know of some mycologists who simply ignore genera like Aureoboletus, Boletinus, Boletinellus, and, maybe correct, Rubinoboletus.
If I was to be asked I would go back to a time when there have not been so much splittings e.g. I still do not want to acknowledge the splitting of Xerocomus and Leccinum. I am too used to old formulas by now to always like to search for the newest name applicable. The only reason I do is the internet because nowadays via this medium it is quite easy to be on the most recent level of knowledge. But there is danger of errors in it.

There is no AureoBoletus
By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2012-03-09 11:30:09 PST (-0800)

in his key…, Now you have a reason to contact him!

By: Gerhard Koller (Gerhard)
2012-03-09 04:34:54 PST (-0800)

I am in loose correspondence with Halling but I did not know this key yet.
Some more boletes are to follow.

By: Martin Livezey (MLivezey)
2012-03-09 04:20:17 PST (-0800)

Great Boletes! Have you seen this key? I thought you might enjoy it!